RE: # [boost] Preprocessor: compiler/library/user bug?

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-09 01:33:25

Paul Mensonides wrote:
[...]
> That is what the result *should* be, IMO.  It is a valid 
> concatenation of the preprocessing token "d_" and the preprocessing 
> token "some_value" that yields the single, valid preprocessing token 
> "d_some_value".  "other." shouldn't matter anymore.

Yep. 

If 'BOOST_PP_CAT(other.d_,PPV_NAME(I))' is indeed what causes the compiler
to issue the diagnostic, then it's a bug.

Aleksey