From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-09 12:43:58
From: "Eric Woodruff" <Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden]>
> In my reading of the standard, clause 7 (which I pasted earlier) excludes
> pointer conversions from clause 3 below.
Clause 7 is even worse than clause 3, as it says "unspecified", which offers
even less guarantees than "implementation defined".
Anyway, this debate is pointless.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk