From: Mattias Flodin (flodin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-10 11:03:36
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 04:57:14PM +0200, Kasper Peeters wrote:
> > What advantages does this library have over Boost.Graph?
> So in short: the tree library is much simpler than the graph library,
> both in implementation and (most importantly) in usage. The tree
> concept is a lot simpler to understand for most people than the graph
Right -- I've looked at the examples on your web pages and it does
indeed seem much simpler. I like it.
I'm not sure if the GPL license is "free" enough to meet the boost
license requirements though.
-- Mattias Flodin <flodin_at_[hidden]> - http://www.cs.umu.se/~flodin/ Room NADV 102 Department of Computing Science Umeå University S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden -- "In science one tries to tell people, in such a way as to be understood by everyone, something that no one ever knew before. But in poetry, it's the exact opposite. " -- Paul Dirac
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk