From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-10 14:09:03
"Rozental, Gennadiy" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > BOOST_CHECK_TYPEID(type, expected), verifies that the two
> > types are the same
> > (note that this is not as simple as just checking
> > is_same<>::value, because
> > we can't rely on that template working without partial specialisation
> > support....
> I just recall that MPL is using boost::is_same for it's testing. It it
> correct way to do considering remark above?
The remark is basically wrong and was retracted.
-- David Abrahams * Boost Consulting dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk