From: Larry Evans (jcampbell3_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-12 17:10:22
John Maddock wrote:
>The formal review for the Spirit Parser Framework begins today, and runs
>until the end of Sunday 20th October.
>Discussion should take place on the main boost developer list
>(boost_at_[hidden]), please state in your review whether you think the
>framework should be accepted into boost or not.
Spirit should be accepted.
I'd suggest a change in the rule.html file. This file contains the
Cyclic references will result in memory leaks.
which is followed by an example with no cycles. However, I think
even with cycles, there should be some explanation of why weak_ptr<rule>
couldn't occur on the rhs and avoid the cycle problem.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk