Re: [boost] 1.29.1

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-16 20:58:27

Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I think that a number of things that were supposed to go into 1.29.0
> > didn't quite make it correctly, e.g.:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Boost-Users/message/2072. Should we
> > think about doing a 1.29.1 release?
> 
> If so, I'd like to exclude the random number changes from getting
> into 1.29.1, they still don't seem to work on a number of
> compilers.

We'd be making a new branch off of Version_1_29_0, so only changes
that were explicitly backported would show up in the release.

-- 
                    David Abrahams
dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Building C/C++ Extensions for Python: Dec 9-11, Austin, TX
http://www.enthought.com/training/building_extensions.html