From: Michael Glassford (glassfordm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-21 12:52:05
I've been following the thread you reference at the end of your post. I
found the reference you posted in
(implementing rwlocks via compare-and-swap instructions) particularly
interesting, but haven't had time to follow up in it yet.
"Alexander Terekhov" <terekhov_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Michael Glassford wrote:
> > a) As I understand it, an implementation of rw locks using condition
> > variables, etc., (such as this one), although it may be correct, will be
> > inefficient. I hope at some point to address this, particularly if there
> > interest from others.
> Others (I speak for myself and a few friends over here -- in this case)
> usually use pthread_rwlock_t/pthread_rwlockattr_t...
> (Subject: Re: rwlock using pthread_cond)
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk