From: Andrei Alexandrescu (andrewalex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-24 11:18:51
"Daniel Frey" <daniel.frey_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> Ah, and while we're at it, anyone else hates the syntax and
>> semantics of member initializers?
>Well, it doesn't look very nice, but is there any real problem with it?
Perhaps that initializers are silently executed in a different order than
the one you specify? It should be an error if you don't provide the
-- All new! THE C++ Seminar: Oct. 28-30 in Vancouver, WA. http://www.thecppseminar.com/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk