From: Srivatsan Raghavan (vraghavan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-25 01:58:55
Paul Selormey wrote:
>The bloat points on Greta and Regexp++ is really interesting.
>I have raised this bloat issue with Regexp++, but got no support :((
>and never knew another bloat is on its way :-)
>I particularly blamed boost for the Regexp++ bloat, since the version
>before boost is still about 250 KB DLL on VC6 :-( What really have changed
>Now, my main interest. The Greta library site is updated but I could not
>download it, anyone having the same problem? I tried both NS6 and IE6.
>Any independent verifications that Greta is 7 times faster than Regexp++?
>Please gurus, drive this bloat issue to the max. We currently need a good
>regular expression for the great Scintilla editor component -
>the PCRE license is not interesting, but the bloat is preventing the
>use of Regexp++. The whole Scintilla editor with basic regular expression
>support is 190 KB (with VC++ 6.0), to add 550 KB+ dll regular
>expresssion seems too much :((
Dr. John Maddox (the author of Regex++) did some time trials on the
various regex implementations available
and it appears that claims that "Greta is 7 times faster than Regex++"
however, in many cases greta does currently beat Boost::regex , however,
the site has a link to an
"experimental recursive version of Boost::regex" which appears to
perform impressively well :)
you can examine the results & the code here :
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk