From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-27 21:48:38
At 12:01 PM 10/27/02, Rene Rivera wrote:
>[2002-10-27] John Maddock wrote:
>>What happened to the "Jamfile"'s then?
>Historical baggage ;-) It will be possible with V2 to use the lowercase
>version "jamfile", or even "jamfile.jam". And perhaps we should decide
>what the preferred name for jamfiles should be from V2 onwards.
>Possibilities for V2 are: Jamfile, jamfile, Jamfile.jam, or jamfile.jam.
"jamfile" gets my vote.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk