Re: Jamfile vs. jamfile vs. Jamfile.jam vs jamfile.jam (was... [boost] ** type traits broken **)

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-28 12:41:00

At 12:33 AM 10/28/2002, Rene Rivera wrote:

 >> >what the preferred name for jamfiles should be from V2 onwards.
 >> >Possibilities for V2 are: Jamfile, jamfile, Jamfile.jam, or 
jamfile.jam.
 >>
 >>"jamfile" gets my vote.
 >
 >I personally prefer "jamfile.jam"...
 >
 >"jamfile" has the disadvantages that:
 >- then we have a bunch of "Jamfile" to "jamfile" renames to ask 
SourceForge
 >to do.
 >- Windows, KDE, and Gnome users don't have a convenient extension to map 
to
 >their editor.

Both good points.  I think you converted me:-)

--Beman