Boost logo

Boost :

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-28 12:41:00

At 12:33 AM 10/28/2002, Rene Rivera wrote:

>> >what the preferred name for jamfiles should be from V2 onwards.
>> >Possibilities for V2 are: Jamfile, jamfile, Jamfile.jam, or
>>"jamfile" gets my vote.
>I personally prefer "jamfile.jam"...
>"jamfile" has the disadvantages that:
>- then we have a bunch of "Jamfile" to "jamfile" renames to ask
>to do.
>- Windows, KDE, and Gnome users don't have a convenient extension to map
>their editor.

Both good points. I think you converted me:-)


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at