Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Neal D. Becker (nbecker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-29 11:50:54

Next message: Neal D. Becker: "Re: [boost] Reference documentation: one approach"
Previous message: George A. Heintzelman: "Re: [boost] namespace organization (was Poisoning Koenig lookup)"
In reply to: Maciej Sobczak: "Re: [boost] Reference documentation: one approach"
Next in thread: William E. Kempf: "Re: [boost] Reference documentation: one approach"
Reply: William E. Kempf: "Re: [boost] Reference documentation: one approach"
Reply: Jaakko Jarvi: "Re: [boost] Reference documentation: one approach"

I agree that LaTeX is a good choice. The problem with DocBook/XML is
lack of any reasonable way to express mathematics. There is a MathML,
but it is immature, not widely supported, and not intended to be
read/written by humans.

Next message: Neal D. Becker: "Re: [boost] Reference documentation: one approach"
Previous message: George A. Heintzelman: "Re: [boost] namespace organization (was Poisoning Koenig lookup)"
In reply to: Maciej Sobczak: "Re: [boost] Reference documentation: one approach"
Next in thread: William E. Kempf: "Re: [boost] Reference documentation: one approach"
Reply: William E. Kempf: "Re: [boost] Reference documentation: one approach"
Reply: Jaakko Jarvi: "Re: [boost] Reference documentation: one approach"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk