Re: [boost] Reference documentation: one approach

From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-30 13:07:18

I've been using Doxygen for a couple (gee is it 3 already?) years and have 
found it easy to use for simple things, and possible to use for complex 
things.  I like especially that the "source" of the documentation is in the 
"source" of the program.

Now if I could just get "tagfiles" figured out, I'd be very happy with it.

At Tuesday 2002/10/29 08:46, you wrote:

>----- Original Message -----
>From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
>To: "Boost mailing list" <boost_at_[hidden]>
>Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:04 PM
>Subject: Re: [boost] Reference documentation: one approach
>
> > I very much dislike the idea of having the /source/ of our docs be in
> > any kind of <tag>...</tag> representation. I would like to explore a
> > more-readable (and typable) alternative: ReStructuredText.
> >
> >    http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/rst/quickref.html
>
>I suggest Doxygen.
>http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/
>
>Stefano
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Victor A. Wagner Jr.      http://rudbek.com
PGP RSA fingerprint = 4D20 EBF6 0101 B069 3817 8DBF C846 E47A
PGP D-H fingerprint = 98BC 65E3 1A19 43EC 3908 65B9 F755 E6F4 63BB 9D93
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"