From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-30 13:07:18
I've been using Doxygen for a couple (gee is it 3 already?) years and have
found it easy to use for simple things, and possible to use for complex
things. I like especially that the "source" of the documentation is in the
"source" of the program.
Now if I could just get "tagfiles" figured out, I'd be very happy with it.
At Tuesday 2002/10/29 08:46, you wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
>To: "Boost mailing list" <boost_at_[hidden]>
>Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:04 PM
>Subject: Re: [boost] Reference documentation: one approach
> > I very much dislike the idea of having the /source/ of our docs be in
> > any kind of <tag>...</tag> representation. I would like to explore a
> > more-readable (and typable) alternative: ReStructuredText.
> > http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/rst/quickref.html
>I suggest Doxygen.
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
PGP RSA fingerprint = 4D20 EBF6 0101 B069 3817 8DBF C846 E47A
PGP D-H fingerprint = 98BC 65E3 1A19 43EC 3908 65B9 F755 E6F4 63BB 9D93
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk