From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-30 16:33:35
Douglas Gregor <gregod_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Wednesday 30 October 2002 12:29 pm, Jeff Garland wrote:
> > Well I had given up on generation, but maybe I was premature. One topic we
> > might discuss is the format for putting these sorts of comments in the
> > code.
> I wouldn't give up on generation just yet, but we can't _require_ generation.
> Well, I can't use generation, because there is no way that any program is
> going to take function/function_template.hpp as input and come back with
> sensible documentation.
I wouldn't count on it. I am getting _reasonable_ results for
preprocessor-generated portions of Boost.Python, and with suitable
annotation in comments I believe we could even generate the _desired_
-- David Abrahams dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk