From: James Curran/MVP (jamescurran_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-31 14:31:36
"Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Doug Gregor, Jaakko Jarvi, and Gary Powell were at the meeting, and worked
> until 3 AM revising and syncing their proposals. These revisions were
> accepted by the LWG, and then the full committee, so function object
> wrappers and tuples became the first libraries formally accepted for the
> Library TR. Congratulations!
Forgive me if this subject was dealt with elsewhere.....
I assume that this now means that these classes should be defined in the
std:: namespace. What effect does that have on Boost? Should their
reference versions here be moved into std:: or kept in boost::? If we move
them to std::, must they be frozen to exactly match what's in the TR, or it
further development possible on them?
-- Truth, James Curran www.NovelTheory.com (Personal) www.NJTheater.com (Professional) www.aurora-inc.com (Day job)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk