[boost] Re: C++ committee Library TR progress in Santa Cruz

From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-31 18:36:28

Douglas Gregor wrote:

> On Thursday 31 October 2002 02:31 pm, James Curran/MVP wrote:
>
> [...]
> >    I assume that this now means that these classes should be defined 
> > in the std:: namespace.  What effect does that have on Boost? Should 
> > their reference versions here be moved into std:: or kept in 
> > boost::?  If we move them to std::, must they be frozen to exactly 
> > match what's in the TR, or it further development possible on them?
> [...]

Just out of curiosity, is it realistic to believe any vendor will supply 
a different implementation than the Boost version?

Dave