From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-31 18:36:28
Douglas Gregor wrote:
> On Thursday 31 October 2002 02:31 pm, James Curran/MVP wrote:
> > I assume that this now means that these classes should be defined
> > in the std:: namespace. What effect does that have on Boost? Should
> > their reference versions here be moved into std:: or kept in
> > boost::? If we move them to std::, must they be frozen to exactly
> > match what's in the TR, or it further development possible on them?
Just out of curiosity, is it realistic to believe any vendor will supply
a different implementation than the Boost version?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk