Re: [boost] is_pod.hpp change and RC_1_29_0

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-31 23:25:04

Thomas Witt <witt_at_[hidden]> writes:

> IIUC the recent change from is_POD.hpp to is_pod.hpp broke the RC_1_29_0 
> branch. RC_1_29_0 now has lower case is_pod.hpp, but non of the other headers 
> are fixed. I guess this is due to the neccessary cvs fiddling.
> 
> Did I miss something ?

I don't know... but I think nobody's supposed to be changing the
RC_1_29_0 branch at this point. What actually changed there?

-- 
                    David Abrahams
dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com