From: Daryle Walker (dwalker07_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-01 01:00:25
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, at 1:51 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
> At 02:42 AM 10/25/02, Daryle Walker wrote:
>> As another poster on this subject has said, Roman numbers don't have
>> different math rules, they are just a different external
>> of natural numbers. This suggests that the place for new code is in
>> the I/O system! We'll use a special locale with custom facets.
> Boost libraries shouldn't always be dead serious. There should be a
> for fun libraries too. They can be useful, too, and often make good
> teaching examples.
I didn't imply anything about the seriousness or levity on this
subject. But having a "fun" project doesn't mean you should be lax on
where to approach the problem.
> I hope those interested in Roman Numerals continue to work on the
> and come up with a nice little library for Boost!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk