Re: [boost] is_pod.hpp change and RC_1_29_0

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-01 10:07:02

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

John,

On Friday 01 November 2002 12:47, John Maddock wrote:
> No, I did, I'll get it fixed (eventually), but is the release branch still
> in use?

In the run-up towards a release I use the release branch, making infrequent 
updates. To get the final version I usally only update the release branch. So 
that's how I discovered the problem.

In general I think that the release branch should be usable. I.e. reflecting 
the released version with possible minor tweaks if we choose to use the 
release branch to provide patched releases (e.g. 1.29.1).

>
> Actually if your using the release branch can you make the change of all
> occurrences of is_POD.hpp to is_pod.hpp?

I can make the neccessary changes. I just didn't want to fiddle with the 
branch while I was not 100% sure what's going on.

- --Thomas

- -- 
Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Witt
Institut fuer Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau und -betrieb, Universitaet Hannover
voice: [phone] - 4273, fax: [phone]
http://www.ive.uni-hannover.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9wpia0ds/gS3XsBoRAgAjAKCADqakyLxwXeOwyGUoZsXJsaa6PACfWaYl
c3ccq7nICqlXBuz0Tu8sv0Q=
=866g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----