RE: [boost] signals questions

From: David Bergman (davidb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-01 11:30:36

You mean that a connection is always connected, by definition (I am
talking about the concept "connection", not about any particular
realization)? I agree. Else, the connection would be a "socket" in
nature...

/David

-----Original Message-----
From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
[mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of David Abrahams
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 1:31 AM
To: Boost mailing list
Subject: Re: [boost] signals questions

Should we think about renaming connection::connected() to
connection::active()? It makes more sense to me.

-- 
                    David Abrahams
dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost