From: Kevin S. Van Horn (Kevin.VanHorn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-04 18:04:41
Greg Colvin writes:
> So why don't we just have a replaceable handler function that can
> throw or abort or whatever?
That's certainly an extension worth doing, but it's very convenient to
have commonly-used defaults (throw or abort) that can be changed merely by
defining or not defining a symbol.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk