From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-05 00:27:19
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>>Hmm... I believe it must be fixed in Boost, then. Why don't Boost.Test
>>build shared libraries
> Is it enough to use dll instead of lib to provide it? Could I do both?
Yes, I believe.
>>and don't have "boost" in their names, contrary to
>>all other libraries. Gennadiy, what do you think?
> I have nothing against other then it slightly long.
It is slightly long in fact. I think, however, that consistency with
other libraries and more specific name of file in /usr/lib
worth the trouble.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk