|
Boost : |
From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-05 16:22:22
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gennaro Prota" <gennaro_prota_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 2:57 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: Boost Array: read/write access to entire data
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:46:51 -0300, "Fernando Cacciola"
> <fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> >Look for the threads [...] specially at the participation from Anthony
> >Williams who brought up the technique I was referring to.
>
>
> I gave it a look. The technique is remarkable, and IMHO useful when a
> discriminated union is needed/opportune by design.
>
I also think it is useful for the case when you have more than one object
and you don't know how to perform a (no throw) move/swap of those objects.
That is, if you have:
T[0]
T[1]
...
How do you implement no-throw swapping without a transacted approach (so
that you can rollback state in case of an exception)?
The double buffer would allow you to have no-throw swap in the array even if
you don't have it in the objects themselves.
Fernando Cacciola
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk