|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-07 17:15:30
I notice that our type_traits headers still define:
typedef char yes_type;
typedef double no_type;
Which is non-portable w.r.t. sizeof() differences. Is there any reason
we can't change no_type to
char (&)[2]
or
struct { char[2] x; } // if it needs to be constructed
?
-- David Abrahams dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk