|
Boost : |
From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-10 01:35:50
Paul Mensonides wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Aleksey Gurtovoy" <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]>
>
> > > You can already detect whether it has operator() (or any other member
> > > function for that matter). Is that what you want?
> >
> > Hmm, Doug is better qualified to answer this question, but suppose that
> > detecting the presence of any number of 'operator()'-s is good enough.
> Would
> > you be able to implement that given the tweaked 14.8.2?
>
> What do you mean by "tweaked"?
With the cleaned up "type deduction success/error?/failure garbage" :)
Aleksey
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk