Date: 2002-11-11 11:30:17
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bohdan [mailto:warever_at_[hidden]]
> <scleary_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> > As John pointed out, you're not going to see much benefit (if any) when
> > standard library contains a pool allocator itself (as does STLport and
> > glibc).
> All boost::pool library is about allocation of small objects
> of the same size. I'm just curious how malloc can be
> accelerated if it handles different size allocations?
Doug Lea's malloc uses a technique he calls "binning", which is pool-based
support for chunks of certain sizes.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk