From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-11 13:27:20
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
> From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
>> "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> > From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
>> >> Even after applying other workarounds, the following patch seems to be
>> >> required to get the Boost.Bind test to pass on the latest Sun
>> >> compilers. Is it appropriate to apply this, or should this problem
>> >> cause the test to fail?
>> >> - BOOST_TEST( bind(&X::hash, _1)(x) == 23558 );
>> >> + BOOST_TEST( bind<unsigned int>(&X::hash, _1)(x) == 23558 );
>> > I think that the right thing is to #ifdef the bind<> path for Sun only.
>> Thanks for responding, Peter. Would you mind making that change?
> It would be more appropriate for someone with access to Sun C++ to make
> Sun-specific changes. :-)
Neither of us has that at the moment, but I want to make sure the
change doesn't get lost.
-- David Abrahams dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk