From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-14 10:41:46
"Eric Woodruff" <Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden]> writes:
> type_info is not portable in the slightest.
There are lots of applications where that doesn't matter. And with a
little postprocessing, the type_info::name() produced by most
compilers could easily be normalized into a common format.
-- David Abrahams dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk