|
Boost : |
From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-15 03:12:02
Hi,
Would it correct to state that following pseudo-code properly reflect the
essence of the appropriate algorithms:
iter_fold( sequence s, state st, binary_operator op ) {
iterator it = s.begin();
while( it != s.end() )
st = op( st, it );
}
fold( sequence s, state st, binary_operator op ) {
iterator it = s.begin();
while( it != s.end() )
st = op( st, *it );
}
iter_fold_backward( sequence s,
state st,
binary_operator backward_op,
binary_operator forward_op = identity ) {
iterator it = s.begin();
while( it != s.end() )
st = forward_op( st, it );
while( --it != s.begin() )
st = forward_op( st, it );
st = forward_op( st, it );
}
fold_backward( sequence s,
state st,
binary_operator backward_op,
binary_operator forward_op = identity ) {
iterator it = s.begin();
while( it != s.end() )
st = forward_op( st, *it );
while( --it != s.begin() )
st = forward_op( st, *it );
st = forward_op( st, *it );
}
Gennadiy.
P.S. MPL docs reference pages does not formatted for printing. They does not
fit the page width. See iter_fold or example.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk