Boost logo

Boost :

From: James Curran/MVP (jamescurran_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-15 09:51:37

    These are generated from XML, correct? If so, could you include a link
to the source XML?

    Also, on the HTML, all the graphic seem to point to broken links.

James Curran  (Personal)   (Professional)   (Day job)
"Douglas Gregor" <gregod_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Hello all,
>   I've improved the DocBook-based reference documentation a bit more.
> & new features:
>   - Ability to use the Docbookesque <classname>foo</classname> to create a
> link to the class named "foo" (as defined in a reference section) within
> text, function signatures, etc.
>   - Better support for syntax highlighting
>   - Better support for man pages
> The current HTMLized version of the Boost.Function docs (incomplete, but
> getting closer...) is here:
> The man pages (very much improved!) are available here:
> Is this the way we want to go with documentation? Should we explore other
> options (e.g., LaTeX) further, or is there any other part of the system we
> need to see working before we can choose? We need a better documentation
> solution for Boost, but if developers think we are going the wrong way and
> won't use it (and don't speak up), then the situation is dire indeed.
> Doug
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at