From: Dave Harris (brangdon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-17 11:28:34
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002 23:43:31 -0500 David Abrahams
> Does anybody else feel they need more time to give this library a
> thorough going-over?
If no more time is available, I'd have to vote against including the
library in its current form. I've posted my concerns in other messages,
but to summarise:
(1) The 1-step construction issue. In other words, whether:
const MyClass object(ar);
can be supported.
(2) Whether the archive handles reference counts correctly.
(3) That variable length integers be supported.
(4) That the limits on version numbers etc are too small.
-- Dave Harris
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk