From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-18 08:07:27
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
> From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
>> > This doesn't look too good if you consider the possible boost->std
>> > transition. :-)
>> But "sp" does? <wink>
>> How about dynamic_pointer_cast<T>(x)?
> Fine with me. You are the LWG guy around here. Whatever you say. ;-)
>> Of course, we can make it work for regular pointers, too.
> That was kind of implied, yes
If 's' stands for "smart" it's also kind of ruled-out by your name.
> although I was more interested in extending
> the same syntax to intrusive_ptr and other (Loki-style, for instance) smart
Please consider dynamic_ptr_cast also. Normally I hate abbrevs, but
all of our smart pointers have "ptr" in the name to it has a
-- David Abrahams dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk