From: Jeremy Siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-19 08:47:09
--On Tuesday, November 19, 2002 1:21 AM -0500 Herve Bronnimann
> Just because I posted something about a new iterator adaptor, and I
> happened to take a look at the boost sandbox, that David was referring
> me to, I'd like to ask: is what is in the sandbox intended to replace or
> to complement the current <boost/iterator_adaptors.hpp>?
Yes, it is intended to replace the current iterator_adaptors.hpp.
> The reason I am asking is that a brief reading failed to point out how
> what's in the sandbox provides reverse_iterator_adaptor<Iterator>, and
> all the existing ones. So am I correct in assuming that the code in the
> sandbox is intended to replace some/all the machinery (first 700 lines
> or so) of the current <boost/iterator_adaptors.hpp>? that it's internal
> to the implementation of the adaptors? and that we'll be able to use in
> the future the iterator adaptors unchanged in syntax and semantic?
No, the sandbox stuff is just incomplete and very much under construction.
And it will have a different public interface from the old version.
Thomas, have you checked your new version in yet?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk