Re: [boost] iterator_adaptors

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-19 20:56:27

Thomas Witt <witt_at_[hidden]> writes:

> My idea of the further schedule is
>
> - Check whether we all agree that this is the version to work from.

I'm on board.

> - Check in to sandbox

> - See whether the interface can be made to work on a reasonable set
>  of compilers.

The SC version was working on a _wide_ set of compilers. Fixing that
once you check in your changes should be a priority.

> - Documentation
> - Port existing iterator_adaptors.

Sounds good.

-- 
                       David Abrahams
   dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution