From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-19 20:56:27
Thomas Witt <witt_at_[hidden]> writes:
> My idea of the further schedule is
> - Check whether we all agree that this is the version to work from.
I'm on board.
> - Check in to sandbox
> - See whether the interface can be made to work on a reasonable set
> of compilers.
The SC version was working on a _wide_ set of compilers. Fixing that
once you check in your changes should be a priority.
> - Documentation
> - Port existing iterator_adaptors.
-- David Abrahams dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk