From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-20 16:40:09
"Fernando Cacciola" <fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I'm not sure if a boost exception class is *needed*, but I see no problem in
> having one.
> Anyway, IIF such an exception class is defined, I *strongly* encourage (as I
> did in the past) that it provides:
> virtual void raise() const
> #ifndef BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS
> throw *this ;
> and that boost libraries throw such exceptions *only* by calling .raise():
> i.e. never with a throw expression directly in the user code.
1. Why should this be a virtual function? The dynamic type of an
exception object is never used in a throw expression.
2. Why are we reinventing the wheel? What's wrong with
boost::throw_exception() from boost/throw_exception.hpp?
-- David Abrahams dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk