From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-26 11:51:39
"Jaap Suter" <J.Suter_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> > own license.
>> ^----- is something missing here?
> Yeah, that should say:
> "From what I know, the biggest problem is that every Boost library has its
> own license."
> It's strange, because my Outlook has the correct message in its 'sent' box,
> so the message must have gotten corrupted somewhere along the way. Ah well,
> the mysteries of computer science :).
> Anyway, my company's legal department is currently revisiting the current
> Boost situation, and they will come back with comments and possibly advice
> within the next few days. I'll keep you updated.
Hi Jaap. Any comments for us from your legal department yet?
-- David Abrahams dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk