From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-29 20:02:48
Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >I don't know if it was controversial, but I did bring this up during
> >the review and I do think its very important. The basic definition
> >of an absolute path should be a path that overrides the base path
> >during a resolve. To rephrase, 'foo' is relative because it is an
> >adjustment from the current directory, '/foo' on the other hand
> >takes precendence over the current path. To re-rephrase, '/foo' is
> >relative to the current drive, but not to the current directory.
> That seems like a stretch to me. With your definition, "absolute"
> isn't equivalent to "not relative", and that seems counter
Maybe, but it does seem to capture reality on Windows.
-- David Abrahams dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk