Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-04 14:16:11

Gennaro Prota <gennaro_prota_at_[hidden]> writes:

> On Wed, 04 Dec 2002 10:07:48 -0500, David Abrahams
> <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>No. There are several instances like the one I cited in our test suite
>>(the function lib, I think).
> Now I see, thanks. Unfortunately this is one of those typical
> situations where if one writes the code in order to silent a warning
> (or worse, an error) with a given compiler he gets the opposite
> warning (in this case an "unreachable code") with others. With simple
> functions like e.g.
> int f() { throw xyz(); }
> one can get out of trouble with a (well-commented)
> int f() { return throw xyz(), 0; }
> but I don't know if that's ok for your case (and anyway whether you
> find it preferable to a macro)

I don't. The macro is clearer.

                       David Abrahams
   dave_at_[hidden] *
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at