From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-06 14:20:46
Gennaro Prota <gennaro_prota_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Fri, 06 Dec 2002 09:05:38 -0500, David Abrahams
> <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>You may be right. How about this approach instead?
> Sorry for the late reply. I'm certainly missing something here because
> I thought the solution was just to replace "defined(symbol)" with "(0
> < (symbol))". No?
I don't know. My approach at least detects an explicit define to zero,
FWIW. If someone wants to change the implementation, it's fine with me.
-- David Abrahams dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk