Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-07 17:24:10

"Mark Rodgers" <mark.rodgers_at_[hidden]> writes:

> From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
>> "John Maddock" <jm_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> >> If this fails to compile, we may need to add a dummy "return 0;" at
>> >> the end. I know of two compilers which act this way: Metrowerks and
>> >> HP.
>> >
>> > What do you want to call it?
>> I'm not happy with it, but...
>> BOOST_NO_NON_RETURN_PATH_COMPREHENSION is the best I could come up
>> with :(
> What about having
> or

I like it!

> I think we need to "return" values for types other than int.

Of course. My suggestion would have just been used thus:

           return whatever;

But I like yours better.

                       David Abrahams
   dave_at_[hidden] *
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at