From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-10 11:54:36
"John Maddock" <jm_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I agree completely, and I'll even promise not to change my mind for at least
> a week :-)
Good! You, Aleksey and I all agree. So shall we go with this definition
of BOOST_WORKAROUND from Gennaro Prota?
#define BOOST_WORKAROUND(symbol, test) ((symbol != 0) && (symbol test))
And, I suggest
As the standard "comment" about the last known version where the
workaround is needed.
-- David Abrahams dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk