Re: [boost] [Config] Testing instructions for compiler vendors

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-10 11:54:36

"John Maddock" <jm_at_[hidden]> writes:

> I agree completely, and I'll even promise not to change my mind for at least
> a week :-)

Good! You, Aleksey and I all agree. So shall we go with this definition
of BOOST_WORKAROUND from Gennaro Prota?

   #define BOOST_WORKAROUND(symbol, test) ((symbol != 0) && (symbol test))

And, I suggest

    BOOST_WORKAROUND(__BORLANDC__, |0x569)

As the standard "comment" about the last known version where the
workaround is needed.

-- 
                       David Abrahams
   dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution