From: Carl Daniel (cpdaniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-12 14:01:07
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> This is a formal call for volunteers to fill out a few of the
> open-source license evaluations at
OCLC Research Public License done - fails. Incorporates a potentially
useful technique for dealing with "source code" versus "binary"
distributions. Rather than using those terms, this license speaks in terms
of distributions which and end-user can modify (source code) or cannot
modify (object code).
The one blatent failure is that this license requires an attribution in or
with binary distributions.
Open Software License done - fails. This license requires that all
derivative works must also use this license.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk