[boost] Re: [Config] Testing instructions for compiler vendors

From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-13 18:01:12

On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 17:07:26 -0500, David Abrahams
<dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>> BOOST_WORKAROUND(__SUNPRO_CC, (!) <= 0x530)
>
>Why that one?  Isn't this getting a little obscure?
>
>Does anybody else care how this turns out?

Actually I liked it at once, because I associate the exclamation mark
with the idea of warning. My fear has just to do with the fact that
there may be not a simple implementation working with every
preprocessor. In that case I would hate to have 150 lines of code just
for the "warnize" stuff :-(

Genny.