Re: [boost] Re: [Config] Testing instructions for compiler vendors

From: Paul Mensonides (pmenso57_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-14 15:38:34

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gennaro Prota" <gennaro_prota_at_[hidden]>

> >Someone expressed concern about using the PP lib in the definition of
> >this macro, because, after all, the PP lib itself might want to use
> >it.  I presume you're not worried about that, though.
>
> Sorry to ruin your fun but I'm still with Einstein here (all this
> stuff amuses me as well, just I wouldn't use it in this situation)

No problem.  I'm just pointing out options (and idioms that might apply
elsewhere).  In any case, the use of the PP lib is irrelevant here.  I
understand if you'd rather just use a simpler version though. ;)

Paul Mensonides