From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-17 06:45:05
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> David A. Greene wrote:
> > Thanks for considering this. I think it will be quite
> > useful. I look forward to seeing what you come up with!
> Well, it turned out to be a little bit more complicated than
> I had foreseen, so it's not there yet. Please stay tuned!
Okay, from this moment MPL's lambda supports "reduced" metafunction form
directly (if detected):
template< typename T > struct her
// no 'type' member!
typedef lambda< her<_> >::type f;
typedef apply<f,int>::type t;
The "ordinary" metafunctions work as before.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk