Date: 2002-12-17 18:24:19
> > Were talking exclusively about reflection now... I don't want this muddled
> > with the serialization discussion. They are separate topics. :-)
> Perhaps, but it would be quite disappointing if after going to the
> whole trouble of implementing a reflection framework, we ended up with
> one that was not usuable for basing a serialization library.
I agree. My intention isn't to stifle discussion, only try to avoid
confusion. Serialization and/or persistence is a primary motivator for me,
so if it fails to do this, I would consider the project a failure.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk