From: Matthias Troyer (troyer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-20 02:32:12
> A couple more questions.
> I'm afraid I don't have the time or expertise to create a full C++
> compiler (tho it would be interesting to try using Spirit). If I were
> base a reflection framework on PDT, its parser and toolset comes as
> binaries for the following platforms:
> The actual PDT reflection library is open-source and portable. Would
> this be acceptable for submission to Boost?
For us this would not be useful, since i) we run Boost-based codes also
on platforms other than those listed above and ii) we use different
compilers with incompatible object- file formats. Thus only fully
open-source libraries are useful for us.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk