From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-01 07:18:37
"Paul Mensonides" <pmenso57_at_[hidden]> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
>> Yeah. I have no problem with access protection where it prevents
>> unintentional misuse and improves overall code clarity. However, this
>> seems like it doesn't fit that bill.
> Oh, it does IMHO. Once it is defined it can be reused in all such
You said "it doesn't change the usage syntax", but doesn't it? How to
do you make a recursive invocation which needs to specify something
where the default parameter appears?
BTW, I read your thing about exception-specs, but fail to see any
-- David Abrahams dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk