Re: [boost] [MPL] naming question

From: David A. Greene (greened_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-05 11:26:42

David Abrahams wrote:

>>thought, I am not sure if it's a good choice. Does
>>
>>    apply< unarize<F>, list<int,long> >::type
>>
>>convey the discussed meaning for you?
> 
> 
> No, but I'm not sure that unroll_args does either.
> 
> unroll_args doesn't, in fact, unroll arguments. It's a metafunction
> adapter.  "Unroll" is usually used with loops, not arguments.  But
> that might be the best name we can come up with.

When I did this sort of thing on the runtime side, I called it
"pack/unpack."  What about "unpack_args?"

                          -Dave

-- 
"Some little people have music in them, but Fats, he was all music,
  and you know how big he was."  --  James P. Johnson