[boost] Re: Small thing: yes_type and no_type made public?

From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-08 01:50:57

"Terje Slettebø" <tslettebo_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:05ab01c2b695$2f125c70$cb6c6f50_at_pc...
> Sure, that would be fine. I'm not that familiar with Boost.PP, though,
> so I think I leave it to someone else to write that version. As quite a
> bit of code uses yes_type/no_type, now, it may be a good idea to keep
> them, as well, anyway, for backwards compatibility and simplicity.

Using the PP lib seems like overkill to me.

Dave